Unknown Token
GFyysN…Dx3EVerifying token — refresh in a moment.
Map the top holders as linked-entity clusters — CEX, LP, burn and dev wallets labeled, with a supply-concentration score.
Get a plain-English answer from live on-chain data.
| Time | Side | USD | Tx |
|---|---|---|---|
| sell | $0.00e+0 | 4Vox1E6Z…oDDY | |
| sell | $0.254969 | 3GzL6UKn…7Mcx | |
| sell | $0.140233 | 558rTAWj…E5CL | |
| buy | $1.39 | 3VjiWJRR…GWkU | |
| sell | $1.39 | 2GqeSqMF…naLr | |
| buy | $2.00 | 5jer9uU8…5cJ1 | |
| sell | $2.00 | 3EMiJq21…y5zu | |
| sell | $0.800022 | 2E4yeWCw…pXhC | |
| sell | $0.800022 | 2BUxxghh…gMZV | |
| buy | $2.00 | 5VEWCaof…xYDn | |
| sell | $7.89K | 5AimMQLH…y31Q | |
| buy | $6.00 | ESrycd5i…MiEE | |
| buy | $1.22K | 66jzDXKq…GQ3g |
· 3 clusters found, top one controls 0.00% of supply (3 via daisy-chain funding).
· 4 relay wallets detected in funding chains — operator likely tried to hide the source via pass-through hops.
· Amount-fingerprint match: 2 holders first-funded with 0.002 SOL ±5% despite using different intermediate funders.
· 2 top holders first appeared on-chain within 43m of each other.
· Tight funding burst detected — ≥1 cluster was funded within 5 minutes.
· 1 holder had no on-chain funding history we could read (may be very new or use ZK).
Detection layers (any one of which flags a cluster): (1) shared immediate funder; (2) shared deepest-ancestor across multi-hop daisy chains; (3) pass-through relay hops in the chain; (4) near-identical first-fund amounts (±5%) across different funders; (5) wallet-age cohorts first funded within 1h of each other. CEX-funded holders are treated as organic. Scan covers top 30 holders, chains depth-limited to 4. Max chain depth observed: 4 · relay hops detected: 4.