22 / 100
Bundle risk score (tip: How many of the top-30 holder wallets look coordinated: funded by the same address, clustered into common groups, or appearing simultaneously. Higher = more likely the launch was insider-rigged with sock-puppet wallets.)How many of the top-30 holder wallets look coordinated: funded by the same address, clustered into common groups, or appearing simultaneously. Higher = more likely the launch was insider-rigged with sock-puppet wallets.
· 2 clusters found, top one controls 0.00% of supply (1 via daisy-chain funding).
· 3 relay wallets detected in funding chains — operator likely tried to hide the source via pass-through hops.
· Amount-fingerprint match: 5 holders first-funded with 0.002 SOL ±5% despite using different intermediate funders.
· 2 top holders first appeared on-chain within 8m of each other.
· 4 of 30 top holders funded from a known CEX (organic).
· Tight funding burst detected — ≥1 cluster was funded within 5 minutes.
· 1 holder had no on-chain funding history we could read (may be very new or use ZK).