???
Unknown Token
3yFf9Q…4mFrVerifying token — refresh in a moment.
Unknown Token
3yFf9Q…4mFrVerifying token — refresh in a moment.
Map the top holders as linked-entity clusters — CEX, LP, burn and dev wallets labeled, with a supply-concentration score.
Get a plain-English answer from live on-chain data.
Holder + risk data is still loading from upstream and will appear automatically once available — full intel arrives within ~30 seconds of a token's first decode.
| Time | Side | USD | Tx |
|---|---|---|---|
| sell | $1.55 | jDKUTSun…LQ27 | |
| sell | $1.04K | yP3R69PQ…43rm | |
| sell | $0.544571 | 5JNfuxMe…hdQt | |
| sell | $0.581418 | 2Ahi542M…b4wH | |
| sell | $0.850855 | 3GnbZvJm…vMmt | |
| sell | $0.611863 | imtPgTrK…QrFW | |
| sell | $0.838794 | 3LBDNfDB…QYGe | |
| buy | $1.05K | 2bA4mpvM…u7RM | |
| buy | $0.0995 | 5ukcjioi…RTae | |
| sell | $0.00e+0 | X5KPH2YZ…9mcp |
· 5 clusters found, top one controls 10.80% of supply (4 via daisy-chain funding).
· 4 relay wallets detected in funding chains — operator likely tried to hide the source via pass-through hops.
· Amount-fingerprint match: 6 holders first-funded with 0.002 SOL ±5% despite using different intermediate funders.
· Tight funding burst detected — ≥1 cluster was funded within 5 minutes.
· 1 holder had no on-chain funding history we could read (may be very new or use ZK).
Detection layers (any one of which flags a cluster): (1) shared immediate funder; (2) shared deepest-ancestor across multi-hop daisy chains; (3) pass-through relay hops in the chain; (4) near-identical first-fund amounts (±5%) across different funders; (5) wallet-age cohorts first funded within 1h of each other. CEX-funded holders are treated as organic. Scan covers top 30 holders, chains depth-limited to 4. Max chain depth observed: 4 · relay hops detected: 4.