Verdict
L-Score
37
/ 100
16 pump.fun buys (100% of swaps). The casino's regular.
Bot middlemen took 0.295 (~$44.18) — you paid retail prices for retail outcomes.
The burns6
- 0.295 (~$44.18) routed to platform fee wallets across 16 swaps (avg 0.0184/swap). Top recipient: 9s5r…C2V9.
- 16 pump.fun buys. You didn't find gems — you found exit liquidity for the dev.
Recommended next moves3
Based on what we found. Not financial advice. Definitely emotional advice.
Receipts9
- Total TXsEvery on-chain transaction this wallet has ever signed — all-time. A "+" means the wallet is so active the scan capped before its first tx.
- 20,000+
- SwapsDEX swaps (Jupiter / Raydium / Pump / Orca / etc) seen in the recent activity window the roast analyzed — not all-time.
- 16
- FailedTransactions that reverted on-chain, all-time. You still paid the base + priority fee for every one.
- 79+
- Fees burnedSOL paid to validators (base + priority fees + Jito tips) across the recent activity window the roast analyzed.
Share the L
1200 × 630 · PNGL-Score 37/100
Bot middlemen took 0.295 (~$44.18) — you paid retail prices for retail outcomes.
roasted by @wtfhappenedgg →
126 chars + 24 for the url = 150/280 · 130 left
Want the gentle version? See wrapped· roast a different wallet
Snapshot generated 2026-06-14 04:47 UTC ·
Sources + methodology
Enhanced on-chain tx feed + portfolio + price oracle, with native SOL legs walked per tx. Best-effort attribution — slippage, off-chain transfers, and cross-program inner instructions are not always disambiguated. How we score.